Look for Chico Divorce Attorney or Family Law 359 8810

What Type of Attorney do Y'all Really Need?         Do You Desire to Win?       You Don't Intendance? Then READ MY REVIEWS .... https://affordablefamilylawattorneychico.blogspot.com/

*People must intendance,  considering about 2,609- 2,8572,934-  vii,808 people take read this post*

Practice you have a case where you want to win, or need to win your case?
Do you have the winning facts?  Exercise you know what law would or would non support your position? Exercise you desire or need an bodily litigator for your case?

Hiring an abet (attorney litigator) is not the aforementioned as hiring collaborative attorneys. Likewise, mediating* a example with only ane chaser means ...The mediator helps people talk the issues through, supposedly helping to "settle" the dispute themselves. In this attorney's opinion, it would not be recommended in virtually cases, because typically the overbearing spouse simply bulldozes the other spouse.

*[Arbitration for visitation is non the aforementioned thing as mediation of an unabridged divorce case. Mediation for visitation/custody is required by law in CA when at that place is no agreement.]

There are many pitfalls that tin ascend in divorce; many of them involve financial transactions that ane spouse had no cognition of; avails that i spouse did not know most; children that were conceived outside the marriage and spouse never knew other spouse was paying; hugger-mugger business dealings that was predicated on all cash; illegal actions by i spouse implicating the other spouse who had no knowledge; large debts racked upwards past 1 spouse, without the other spouse even knowing such debt existed; one spouse signing the other spouse's name for a credit carte, and so ruining the other spouse'south credit.... NONE of these things, in this attorney's opinion, should be addressed in either mediation or collaborative police force scenario.

That is considering there was a huge alienation of fiduciary duty that has serious consequences to the guilty spouse. That should be done in court since the guilty spouse should have to pay for wrongdoing. (Of course if you lot are too afraid because your spouse might try and kill you lot then you better become become help right away.)

Peculiarly if y'all have bug in the 3 lines beneath, which happened BEFORE the case finalized---- you should never hire anyone except an advocate litigator. Aggressive at that. Plus, at that place are huge time barriers to trying to fix aside any of this!

Fraud, Duress
Fault, Coercion,
Failure to Exchange Declarations (Assets Debts)-or-
  when exchanged, i.e.--have false, misleading or improper numbers, values, dates..

When clients hire attorneys to get something done, peculiarly in family law, it's often considering one SIDE tried to take advantage of the other side.  If you have a family law example where both of y'all Concur on everything then you lot may not need separate attorneys, except perhaps to create a settlement agreement.
However if you actually never knew your legal rights and decided to just move ahead without knowing if what you were doing could impairment you, that is dangerous. One caveat--beware the notion to eliminate spousal support in the future, NEVER requite up that right. If y'all practice, and you shack up with someone down the line, the other side has ability, potentially, to eliminate your support.... I can't say more than re this topic because it is more complicated than it appears. Only BEWARE!! You should consult an attorney before making any cardinal decisions.

Nevertheless, the vast bulk of nigh divorces and break ups, are because the couple cannot agree on a lot of things, including (just an example....) post judgment orders.........

How to raise the kids-- too lenient?  likewise strict?
How to spend income from employment or inheritance
What to do with spouse that is either dangerous, aggressive, drinks too much
How to go out of supervised visits?? You lot take an ex spouse also?
Your spouse is bipolar and tin can't be controlled?

Of all the problems chaser has seen over several decades, the problems around children tend to generate the worst bug, followed by physical harm, financial issues, and booze or drug use.

And remarkably, attorney has seen clients REFUSE to accept what he/she is entitled to, and so SETTLE a case by using an chaser who is or was a mediator, --- in other words, the attorney is non interim equally a litigator for the client?

If y'all are entitled to something, why would you lot pay someone to settle a instance

when you could have settled it without help????

Collaborative law and mediation means if you don't settle the example

 using whomever y'all hired, those attorneys cannot stand for you in court anyhow.

You And then have to hire new attorneys!!

While arbitration and collaborative may be skilful for some cases (which means you are settling case by paying people to settle it without courtroom)-- it is substantially negotiation. Judges are non involved. If you lot work something out and then don't similar it later--- what you have -- is a problem.

              Some of the down sides of  collaborative law (which includes hiring people like accountants and other experts) and which makes it costly:

The Expense; Touch of termination and cost of new counsel; No advocacy for ane or both parties; directed chat between parties, ability imbalances, hard issues might remain cloak-and-dagger (such as domestic violence, addictions, drugs, gambling, infidelities,etc.); Possible inadequate information collection, potentially less support for views of children.

Basically, in arbitration there is no advocate for YOU.
In collaborative law, BOTH sides work on problems, but NO ONE is an advocate for YOUR side.
The collaborative view is to work out problems, not really take sides as an advocate----a truthful abet is there to represent YOU, non the spouse.

This is role of the reason that most people in a divorce Want an abet, and need a litigator --- because they are being taken advantage of, steamrolled, or being misled or manipulated.

You don't take to believe attorney, look at one of my other sites for example, where information technology is stated in plain English, by the mediator--  that making the decisions with a mediator is not the error of the mediator, and the mediator is quoted... (and quite frankly,the mediator does state the truth)

                        " The part of the mediator is to assist the participants attain an agreement.

 It is not the mediator's function to give legal advice or to assure

 that the agreement is fair or equitable to either party.

There may well be unintended consequences resulting in one or more

 of the participants suffering "buyers remorse",  but they made the determination

  to accept the terms  and entered into the agreement, not the mediator..."

Note--over again, the "mediation" we are speaking of, is NOT the family unit police mediation process that the COURTS exercise, for contested custody.

       Private mediation means both parties choose to use one mediator to arrive at some agreement, and because a mediator does not manipulate legal advice the manner a legal advocate would do--as in actual litigation--where each party is represented by their ain separate chaser-- the "mediator" himself or herself--- is only profitable both parties to REACH an understanding.
________________________________________________________________________________

***  Carefully NOTE-- the mediator does not need to assure    either party that the agreement is fair or equitable to either party.

(Supposedly because that isn't the mediator's "role".....)

LOL-- that's fine if you lot don't care what you are getting,
 or you don't know your rights and you lot don't intendance about
about that either??

 Unfortunately---if you do this and  "so" realize you lot lost out on something
 considering you lot did Not know your rights at all---then guess what???

 Y'all are in trouble, most likely.

_________________________________________________________________________________

*** I  can nigh guarantee that this  blog has more than information in Northern CA on issues that arise, than the majority of  family unit law websites. Some attorneys practice explain the laws, yes.   Attorney herein,  typically will write, argue, and inform... and help people, the purpose of the writing is to hopefully enlighten--so that you can make amend decisions. Many attorneys are afraid to talk almost winning and losing cases considering some type of stance could exist involved, however, every client always has their ain opinions, and those usually demand to be understood starting time?

Annotation: all of our content is original, if we take mentioned a subject field from another site, inquiry info or like, we will include a link. Nosotros have no need to use other people's content and claim it is ours. In animal law nosotros may occasionally quote, due to the specificity of the data,but there will ordinarily be a link also.
At that place is one family law attorney site down in So Cal which is fantastic, and co-ordinate to their site, they usually win their cases. However. what I noted from the site, previously, is that they practice not take sure types of cases, including Domestic violence or Restraining Orders. They may accept changed that presently though.....They appear to represent well to practice clients with cases that terminate up winning, and they are not agape to give the summary of why, how, when?

    All people reading and browsing should employ their own diligence to obtain correct data and for checking laws, we would use findlaw.com. If y'all practice not have coin to spend for an chaser and have been married a long time, or over x years, or take special needs kids, or have been abused, do NOT simply ignore the law and give your other half whatever he/she says to practise. Consult an attorney to make sure y'all are not being screwed over and taken advantage of !!

.... ----->>>----->>>>> and concluding but not to the lowest degree, another review from another gal that needed assist and direction... The BIGGEST COMPLIMENT EVER....... Tina Taylor's Review of Attorney Chan from 2018 ....

"I spent five years embroiled in a highly contentious divorce in which I lost everything. Too, I was attacked past my ex-hubby during that divorce, leaving me disabled and unable to work."

My attorney in Lassen County did zip to accost this violence and in fact colluded with the other parties counsel. Judicial misconduct also took place in this case.

Oviously, this has left me in a difficult situation both legally and financially. I've spent the better office of a year searching for legal help with no luck whatsoever......... until I chosen Ms. Chan. Although she is non able to have my example, due to the county where information technology took identify, she actually talked with me..

Not merely did she speak with me for more than a few minutes sharing useful information with me, she did so pleasantly, willingly and for no accuse. If that wasn't already more kind and generous, she phoned me a week later giving me the address of a website that has proved extremely helpful.
Ms. Chan's moral principles and ideals are admirable, refreshing, and deserving of respect! Additionally, I read most Ms. Chan's advocacy for animals in her bio and in my opinion, that earns her extra points as a responsible attorney and a fine man existence... --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chaser posts this above---considering: (a) it is true (b) things like this situation are more common than people realize (c) Lassen Canton is definitely corrupt

(d) chaser herein has feel in family police force, civil cases, criminal defense force, bankruptcy, animal constabulary, and probably a little more.....and even if attorney does not know the answer (which happens at times)-- attorney is always willing to try and notice out the reply.... (e) attorney believes that all clients appreciate it when attorney treats them like people, but normal everyday people, with mutual courtesy

(f) chaser believes that many clients are not treated very well past many attorneys generally (g) attorney believes that law school does not ready attorneys to handle people at all, and that many attorneys simply believe they are too 'loftier' on the concatenation, and must talk down to people (h) chaser doesn't believe that winning is everything in all cases, merely for many of the cases, it is crucial. Therefore my goal is to usually win.

Last but non to the lowest degree, chaser has been involved in animal police force cases and related issues, and has what would be considered a very loftier degree of knowledge in animal constabulary issues, including breed specific legislation, dangerous dogs, personal injuries involving dogs/animals, negligence involving animals, animal command/animals, seizures, illegal seizures, humane society groups, fraud by alleged "humane" non profits [good,bad,sued or imitation], lawsuits involving animal command/animals/owners, replevin or writ of possession, abandonment/fines, rescue animals/groups [bona fide/non] bug of rational basis/wellness/welfare/safe, improper application of the BCS method used to convict owners, constitutional police force published cases on First Amendment involving animals; issues involving service animals, therapy and emotional aid animals, vet negligence, fauna corruption (or claimed abuse), penalties for alleged abuse or convictions, and more than.

turnerfirelp1967.blogspot.com

Source: https://affordablefamilylawattorneychico.blogspot.com/2016/10/43434343.html

Share this post